Nothing really stuns me anymore about the Left and their lunacy. That was until this week when soulless Columbia professor Mark Lamont Hill appeared on CNN and got giddy about cop killer Chris Dorner. Hill said Dorner’s murderous revenge spree was “exciting,” and was like Jamie Foxx’s character in Tarantino’s latest flick, D’jango Unchained.
Hill doubled down on his stupidity during the same interview by stating Chris’ homicidal orgy was akin to the exploits of a “super hero.” I was speechless when I heard such vomit roll off that quack’s tongue.
In contrast to numb nuts, Dorner's mother, Nancy Dorner, expressed condolences for the victims in a statement given to Robin Sax at Fox 11 Los Angeles. "It is with great sadness and heavy hearts that we express our deepest sympathies and condolences to anyone that suffered losses or injuries resulting from Christopher's actions. We do not condone Christopher's actions.”
Note, those closest to Chris didn’t commiserate with/for him but rather for those who were ruthlessly killed. Mark Lamont, eh … not so much. His capital lay with Chris.
In my book, Hill jumped the shark with those comments and I hope that all of what’s left of legitimate talent bookers on the various networks treat him like the plague. Like a Rottweiler with rabies. Hill is unbelievably disgusting.
Can you imagine someone of a conservative stripe stating that James Holmes’ melee in Aurora was titillating, understandable and smacked of a heroism? Huh? Holmes had a manifesto, is he cool too, Mark?
And what about Cho Seung-Hui, Mr. Hill? Is he like Bruce Lee or Jackie Chan? I mean, he also drafted docs explaining why he “had” to frickin’ destroy three dozen college students' lives at Virginia Tech.
Oh, and I almost forgot: what about Adam Lanza? Is he a super hero? Is he “Kick Ass”? I mean … he might have been an offended twenty-something of divorced parents, daddy didn’t love him, the color yellow made him sad or his friends made fun of him on Facebook for his Three Stooges haircut. Should we give Lanza faint praise and cut him some slack for his senseless massacre of six year olds at Sandy Hook because of possible and plausible offenses, huh, Mark?
Here’s my prediction: as long as Hollywood celebrates revenge murders and the likes of CNN keep putting clowns like Hill on TV, we will continue to see whiners shoot up innocent civilians in hopes that jerks like Lamont will sympathize on TV for their murderous plight and make ‘em posthumous heroes.
However, if our culture and our commentators uniformly condemn such actions, the clowns who praise them and the pathetic losers that carry them out, I’m a-guessin’ we could see a reduction in the senseless slaughter of innocent people.
We could call it a High Capacity Idiot Ban.
Finally, I hope to God that families of those murdered by Dorner didn’t hear that BS roll off Hill’s tongue. I cannot imagine the grief they’re going through now accentuated by such callous and calamitous comments.
Check out my BRAND NEW BOOK: Sandy Hook Massacre: When Seconds Count, Police Are Minutes Away.
Doug Giles
Showing posts with label Liberal Hate. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Liberal Hate. Show all posts
Sunday, February 17, 2013
Wednesday, October 17, 2012
Wild Bill for America - Kenny Hates Israel
Bill answers a letter from Kenny, a man who thinks Israel is evil and is responsible for the 9/11 attacks.
Labels:
911,
Islam,
Israel,
Liberal Hate,
Wild Bill for America
Monday, September 3, 2012
Saturday, August 18, 2012
Friday, August 17, 2012
Michelle Malkin - Family Research Council Shooting
Michelle joins Fox and Friends to discuss the latest news items of the day. Today's main topic: The recent terrorist attack at the Family Research Council in Washington, DC, and the lack of concern displayed by the main stream media, coupled with the wave of hatred from other groups who oppose the conservative values of the FRC. Michelle also weighs in with her take on first lady, Michelle Obama's comments about Obamacare being able to prevent death; and the latest exploits of gaffetastic bozo VP Joe Biden.Wednesday, August 1, 2012
Homosexual Activists and Liberal Progressives Call for Boycott of Chick-Fil-A
“We are very much supportive of the family – the biblical definition of the family unit, We are a family-owned business, a family-led business, and we are married to our first wives. We give God thanks for that. … We know that it might not be popular with everyone, but thank the Lord, we live in a country where we can share our values and operate on biblical principles.”Dan Cathy CEO Chick-Fil-A
Homosexual Activists and Liberal Progressive Democrats demanded a 'Boycott' of Chick-Fil-A Restaurants and Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel and Boston Mayor Thomas Menino agreed. Here are some pictures of the results of their call to Boycott:
Alexandria VA
Allentown PA
Beaumont TX
Fayetteville NC
Fort Meyers FL
West Palm Beach FL
Washington DC
Typical Across America
Typical Across America
Typical Across America
Sunday, June 10, 2012
Mike Adams - I Hate Mike Adams
I love being hated. And if you don’t think I’m hated then you haven’t read my most recent rating on www.RateMyProfessor.com. For those too lazy to click the link (that means liberals), I’ve reprinted the latest rating below:
“I hate this guy on a personal level. He is a hyper-conservative homophobic a**hole. I disagree with his beliefs in every way and have never in my life had a professor or teacher I disliked more. I have to admit he's a good professor as far as covering course material in a clear manner, but his class policy is also very strict.”
In just four sentences, this student has succinctly summarized at least six major problems with liberalism in America. They follow in no particular order of importance:
My plan is pure genius. It’s the new “I Hate Mike Adams” t-shirt, which will be available in small, medium, large, and extra-large sizes. This new t-shirt will be sold at all of my speeches under the following variable pricing scheme:
$12 for conservatives
$15 for liberals
$20 for feminists
$50 for homosexual rights activists
My reasoning for variable pricing is simply that some groups are angrier than others and will get more benefit from expressing their hatred. So, naturally, they should have to pay more. If you are a liberal, feminist, or homosexual activist who is taking one of my courses then feel free to wear it to class.
The “I Hate Mike Adams” t-shirt will replace the need for anonymous hate speech on RateMyProfessors.com. Everyone can come out of the closet at once and start contributing to my early retirement. And that’s a cause that both Mike Adams and his haters can get behind!
Mike Adams
“I hate this guy on a personal level. He is a hyper-conservative homophobic a**hole. I disagree with his beliefs in every way and have never in my life had a professor or teacher I disliked more. I have to admit he's a good professor as far as covering course material in a clear manner, but his class policy is also very strict.”
In just four sentences, this student has succinctly summarized at least six major problems with liberalism in America. They follow in no particular order of importance:
1. Hate speech is a one-way street. When conservatives speak, their speech can still be labeled “hate speech” even if it does not contain the word “hate.” But liberals can avoid a charge of hate speech even when using the phrase “I hate” as an opener. Liberal hate is well-intentioned and tends to focus on broader social goals. It isn’t the words that determine whether something is free speech. It’s the sentiment that lies behind them.Oddly enough, I feel sorry for this disgruntled student - although I’m glad he helped everyone better understand the liberal mindset. But he should not have had to wait until the end of the semester to express his hatred. So I’m coming to the rescue with a new plan than will help angry liberals (please pardon the redundancy) while earning me money for guns, cigars, guitars, and ammunition.
2. Everyone else is extreme. The term hyper-conservative is usually applied to people who believe crazy things like “marriage involves one man and one woman” or “it’s wrong to dismember innocent babies.” According to liberals, about 80% of the population is “hyper-conservative” for one reason or another.
3. Every disagreement involves a “phobia.” A phobia is an irrational fear of something. Liberals usually apply this term to people like me who are not afraid to say anything. Absence of fear? Irrational fear? It’s all the same in the mind of the liberal.
4. Disagreement with ideas justifies personal vilification. Note that the above-quoted student links total disagreement with ideas to maximum “dislike” for individuals. Also, note that he does so in the same sentence. The cause/effect connection is inescapable. Because he disagreed with my “beliefs” the liberal student “disliked” me more than any other teacher. The student makes no effort to give any other reason than the ideas themselves. In other words, hatred of ideas = hatred of persons. And the former justifies the latter.
5. Qualifications are of minimal relevance. Eventually, the liberal student admits I cover the material in a “clear manner” - but not until after all the other personal attacks are aired. Personal characteristics are more important than competence. That is why a liberal clings to affirmative action like a conservative clings to guns and religion.
6. Standards are a form of oppression. Maybe he was mad that my ban on laptops in class kept him from getting status updates from the Perez Hilton Facebook fan page while listening to my lectures. Regardless, the insistence that we all follow rules did not mesh with his otherwise stellar commitment to equality. Liberals think standards are fine as long as they are applied to other people. When applied to everyone, the interest in equality is often replaced by an interest in tolerance.
My plan is pure genius. It’s the new “I Hate Mike Adams” t-shirt, which will be available in small, medium, large, and extra-large sizes. This new t-shirt will be sold at all of my speeches under the following variable pricing scheme:
$12 for conservatives
$15 for liberals
$20 for feminists
$50 for homosexual rights activists
My reasoning for variable pricing is simply that some groups are angrier than others and will get more benefit from expressing their hatred. So, naturally, they should have to pay more. If you are a liberal, feminist, or homosexual activist who is taking one of my courses then feel free to wear it to class.
The “I Hate Mike Adams” t-shirt will replace the need for anonymous hate speech on RateMyProfessors.com. Everyone can come out of the closet at once and start contributing to my early retirement. And that’s a cause that both Mike Adams and his haters can get behind!
Mike Adams
Labels:
hat,
Liberal Academia,
Liberal Bias,
Liberal Hate,
Mike Adams
Monday, May 21, 2012
Wild Bill for America - The Nazis of Palestine
The Palestinians of Israel are following the goals of Nazism by calling for a new holocaust against the Jewish people.Thursday, November 17, 2011
Wild Bill for America - Hateful Laughs
Nothing Funny About Liberal Comedians.Visit the Wild Bill for America Blog
Following the death of Muammar Qaddafi, Orlando Jones the MADtv star tweeted, “Libyan Rebels kill Gaddafi, if American liberals want respect they better stop listening to Aretha & kill Sarah Palin."
Orlando Jones
"Rush Limbaugh, 'I hope the country fails' -- I hope his kidneys fail, how about that? ... He needs a good waterboarding, that's what he needs."
Wanda Sykes
“Rush Limbaugh is beginning to look more and more like Mr. Big, and at some point somebody’s going to jam a CO2 pellet into his head and he’s going to explode like a giant blimp. That day may come. Not yet, but we’ll be there to watch.”
Chris Matthews
NOTE: To share or email this 'Specific' article, you must click on the Title of the article.
Labels:
Liberal Hate,
Radical Left,
Wild Bill for America
Friday, August 12, 2011
Ann Coulter On London Riots
Those of you following the barbaric rioting in Britain will not have failed to notice that a sizable proportion of the thugs are white, something not often seen in this country. Not only that, but in a triumph of feminism, a lot of them are girls. Even the "disabled" (according to the British benefits system) seem to have miraculously overcome their infirmities to dash out and steal a few TVs. Congratulations, Britain! You've barbarized your citizenry, without regard to race, gender or physical handicap! Related Post: Anarchy in the United Kingdom
Related Post: Philadelphia Mayor Condemns Violent Flash Mobs
Related Post: Obama Administration Arms Deadly Gang MS-13
Related Post: Flash Mob Robberies Not a Rare Occurrence in Washington DC
NOTE: To share or email this 'Specific' article, you must click on the Title of the article.
Sunday, January 23, 2011
Robin of Berkeley - The “Good Progressive”
Last night, I had the worst dreams. I awoke feeling like I had gone through a war zone. In some ways, I had.
The details are murky, but several dreams involved the Black Panthers and the Mafia. There was this ominous, creepy vibe throughout because of the constant threat of violence. Fortunately, I had a final dream before awakening that was comforting.
In this last dream, it was Christmas eve, and I longed to attend an early evening service. I couldn’t get anyone on the phone at this particular church to tell me the time.
Finally, I went over to the church, and peeked into the sanctuary, which was a lovely place. While there were several people preparing for the service, none knew what time it started. Finally, I found someone who could tell me the time, which relieved me greatly.
Now, I have a pretty good idea why I mostly had bad dreams all through the night. It’s because, during the day, I read a highly disturbing article by Michelle Malkin. Malkin provides a pictorial to some of the most violent and malevolent media about Sarah Palin and other conservatives.
Malkin knows from which she speaks: She wrote the book, Unhinged, based partly on the heinous emails she’s received over the years.
Although I’ve linked Malkin’s article, above, here’s a caveat. It contains some of the most blood-curdling, nauseating pictures gathered together in one place. So reader beware.
Viewing these pictures isn’t just upsetting, it is shocking. And, frankly, I’m glad that I can be shocked. I don’t ever want to stop being horrified when something is, in fact, horrifying.
Because when we stop being shocked by evil, we’ve become desensitized. This has happened to countless people out there, especially our young, who are deluged by sex and violence and porn.
What should we do when confronted with horror, such as the Wilding of Sarah Palin? In my opinion, we need to name what we are seeing, to shine a light on the darkness. If what’s happening is hate, we need to call it such. If it’s a Wilding (which means a gang rape), then we need to state this as well.
I tried to do this with one progressive who commented on my provocative article, Why the Left Hates Sarah Palin. This progressive maintained that Palin was hated because she was stupid and brought it on herself.
I picked apart his argument one by one: first, if we believe someone is stupid, we pity them, we don’t hate them. No, Palin is hated, and that is a different beast entirely.
Further, blaming Palin for her own abuse is that same blame-the-victim mentality that progressives use to discredit the real victim. This guy’s argument only reinforced my conclusion that the treatment of Palin is a type of sexual crime. Of course, rape victims are oftentimes blamed for being assaulted (as in, “She deserved it.”)
But finally, I challenged him to make a statement against the death threats, the rape jokes, and the general sexual degradation of Palin and others. I asked him to assert that such behavior is unacceptable and that he will not participate in it. Disappointing, he did not respond.
Now, there are people who actually commit crimes, and then there are those who aid and abet it. Most of us (at least on the Right) recognize when someone commits an evil act, for instance, the Jihadist, Major Hasan, at Ft. Hood.
But evil also happens when good people do nothing. So when a gang of hoods, for instance, rape a woman, the rapists are fully responsible for their crime. However, if people are in a position to stop the violence, and they choose not to, they bear responsibility as well. They are the “Good Germans.”
Today, we have the perpetuators of violence, like those sick and twisted progressives who wish sexual violence on Palin. But there are also the “Good Progressives,” who could stop the atrocities but do not. Many of them are politicians and the media; some are simply private citizens.
Every time someone laughs at a rape joke, or forwards a revolting web page, that person is a “Good Progressive. “ He or she is disseminating evil.
I know what I’m talking about: I was a “Good Progressive” for the last 30 years, and a liberal before that. While I had no idea of the extent of the violence, the threats, and the other bad behavior, ignorance of the law is no excuse for breaking it, as the expression goes.
So now I’ve realized the error of my ways, and luckily, it’s never too late. Because what I’ve learned is that the conservative way, particularly the Judeo-Christian path, offers redemption and forgiveness.
So even though trying to sleep last night was a nightmare (as has been much of my time in the Left), I am grateful that in the end, the final dream was liberating. In the dream — and real life — I persevered, and found my way to church and ultimately to God.
Will any of the other progressives out there do something similar to me? Will they at least stand with me and renounce violence and threats of violence against others — Left and Right alike?
Or will they choose to remain “Good Progressives” — regardless of the devastating effect of this choice not only on their lives now, but when they breath their final breath?
Robin of Berkeley
Robin is a recovering liberal, and a licensed psychotherapist who lives in Berkeley, California. The above information is intended for entertainment and educational purposes, rather than to offer any kind of definitive diagnoses.
Visit Robin’s blog.
NOTE: To share or email this 'Specific' article, you must click on the Title of the article.
The details are murky, but several dreams involved the Black Panthers and the Mafia. There was this ominous, creepy vibe throughout because of the constant threat of violence. Fortunately, I had a final dream before awakening that was comforting.
In this last dream, it was Christmas eve, and I longed to attend an early evening service. I couldn’t get anyone on the phone at this particular church to tell me the time.
Finally, I went over to the church, and peeked into the sanctuary, which was a lovely place. While there were several people preparing for the service, none knew what time it started. Finally, I found someone who could tell me the time, which relieved me greatly.
Now, I have a pretty good idea why I mostly had bad dreams all through the night. It’s because, during the day, I read a highly disturbing article by Michelle Malkin. Malkin provides a pictorial to some of the most violent and malevolent media about Sarah Palin and other conservatives.
Malkin knows from which she speaks: She wrote the book, Unhinged, based partly on the heinous emails she’s received over the years.
Although I’ve linked Malkin’s article, above, here’s a caveat. It contains some of the most blood-curdling, nauseating pictures gathered together in one place. So reader beware.
Viewing these pictures isn’t just upsetting, it is shocking. And, frankly, I’m glad that I can be shocked. I don’t ever want to stop being horrified when something is, in fact, horrifying.
Because when we stop being shocked by evil, we’ve become desensitized. This has happened to countless people out there, especially our young, who are deluged by sex and violence and porn.
What should we do when confronted with horror, such as the Wilding of Sarah Palin? In my opinion, we need to name what we are seeing, to shine a light on the darkness. If what’s happening is hate, we need to call it such. If it’s a Wilding (which means a gang rape), then we need to state this as well.
I tried to do this with one progressive who commented on my provocative article, Why the Left Hates Sarah Palin. This progressive maintained that Palin was hated because she was stupid and brought it on herself.
I picked apart his argument one by one: first, if we believe someone is stupid, we pity them, we don’t hate them. No, Palin is hated, and that is a different beast entirely.
Further, blaming Palin for her own abuse is that same blame-the-victim mentality that progressives use to discredit the real victim. This guy’s argument only reinforced my conclusion that the treatment of Palin is a type of sexual crime. Of course, rape victims are oftentimes blamed for being assaulted (as in, “She deserved it.”)
But finally, I challenged him to make a statement against the death threats, the rape jokes, and the general sexual degradation of Palin and others. I asked him to assert that such behavior is unacceptable and that he will not participate in it. Disappointing, he did not respond.
Now, there are people who actually commit crimes, and then there are those who aid and abet it. Most of us (at least on the Right) recognize when someone commits an evil act, for instance, the Jihadist, Major Hasan, at Ft. Hood.
But evil also happens when good people do nothing. So when a gang of hoods, for instance, rape a woman, the rapists are fully responsible for their crime. However, if people are in a position to stop the violence, and they choose not to, they bear responsibility as well. They are the “Good Germans.”
Today, we have the perpetuators of violence, like those sick and twisted progressives who wish sexual violence on Palin. But there are also the “Good Progressives,” who could stop the atrocities but do not. Many of them are politicians and the media; some are simply private citizens.
Every time someone laughs at a rape joke, or forwards a revolting web page, that person is a “Good Progressive. “ He or she is disseminating evil.
I know what I’m talking about: I was a “Good Progressive” for the last 30 years, and a liberal before that. While I had no idea of the extent of the violence, the threats, and the other bad behavior, ignorance of the law is no excuse for breaking it, as the expression goes.
So now I’ve realized the error of my ways, and luckily, it’s never too late. Because what I’ve learned is that the conservative way, particularly the Judeo-Christian path, offers redemption and forgiveness.
So even though trying to sleep last night was a nightmare (as has been much of my time in the Left), I am grateful that in the end, the final dream was liberating. In the dream — and real life — I persevered, and found my way to church and ultimately to God.
Will any of the other progressives out there do something similar to me? Will they at least stand with me and renounce violence and threats of violence against others — Left and Right alike?
Or will they choose to remain “Good Progressives” — regardless of the devastating effect of this choice not only on their lives now, but when they breath their final breath?
Robin of Berkeley
Robin is a recovering liberal, and a licensed psychotherapist who lives in Berkeley, California. The above information is intended for entertainment and educational purposes, rather than to offer any kind of definitive diagnoses.Visit Robin’s blog.
NOTE: To share or email this 'Specific' article, you must click on the Title of the article.
Monday, January 17, 2011
Sean Hannity and Brent Bozell about liberals hates and Lies Speech
NOTE: To share or email this 'Specific' article, you must click on the Title of the article.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)












