PJTV Trifecta - Terror in Boston: The Press Must Stop Blaming America

The mainstream media and their friends wasted no time blaming tax protesters, small government and the Republican Party for the terror attack at the Boston Marathon. Why must the press politicalize everything in this country? Hear more on this Trifecta.

NOTE: To share or email this 'Specific' article, you must click on the Title of the article.

CNN - Kermit Gosnell - House of Horrors

The Philadelphia Inquirer's Joseph Slobodzian says trial of abortion doctor is "grim."

Published on Apr 12, 2013

NOTE: To share or email this 'Specific' article, you must click on the Title of the article.

Andrew Klavan - The Extremists are Coming

Mainstream media "centrists," who are far to the left of most Americans, are concerned the "right wing" Tea Party, which occupies the center of American opinion, will displace "centrist" Democrats who are far, far left. Got it? Now tell your friends.

October 2010

NOTE: To share or email this 'Specific' article, you must click on the Title of the article.

GBR - Israel - GAZA and the MSM

Whose side is the media on in the Israel-Gaza conflict?

NOTE: To share or email this 'Specific' article, you must click on the Title of the article.

Breaking Up With the Mainstream Media

PolitiChick Ann-Marie Murrell has had enough with being constantly ridiculed, denigrated and mentally abused by the mainstream media so she is officially breaking up.

NOTE: To share or email this 'Specific' article, you must click on the Title of the article.

Doug Hagmann - The hidden real truth about Benghazi

Most people know that we’ve been lied to about the attacks in Benghazi, but few realize the extent of those lies or the hidden secrets they cover. After all, the lie is different at every level. Thanks to a well placed source with extensive knowledge about the attack, the disturbing truth is slowly beginning to emerge and is lining up with information contained in my previous articles published here weeks ago (Here, Here and Here). The truth reveals the most serious situation in the world today as it involves the interests and destinies of us all.

A mosaic of lies

According to the U.S. government, Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other Americans were killed during a spontaneous protest at the consulate office in Benghazi by a frenzied crowd of Muslims outraged over an obscure internet video. Recently released “sensitive but not classified e-mails” from Stevens to the U.S. Department of State painted a picture of poor security for U.S. personnel and the embassy, which was obviously true but had little to do with the events of September 11, 2012. The failure to dispatch an extraction team or otherwise rescue the men during a firefight that lasted upwards of nine grueling and tortuous hours was not the result of any intelligence failure, but caused by our unwillingness to widen the conflict and expose the nature and scale of our true mission in Benghazi.

Based on information provided by my source and corroborated elsewhere, the official account by administration officials is a mosaic of lies that were necessary to cover the unpalatable truth of covert actions taking place in Libya, Syria, Turkey, Jordan and Lebanon. The primary objective of our covert actions was to secretly arm anti-Assad “rebels” in Syria by funneling arms from Libya to Syria via Turkey, with other destinations that included Jordan and Lebanon. Regarding the threat to Stevens and the other murdered Americans, the truth will reformat the persistent question posed to government officials, from UN Ambassador Susan Rice to White House Spokesman Jay Carney and others from “how could you not have known” to “how could you have done these things?”

First, it is important to understand that Ambassador Stevens, Sean Smith, Glen Dougherty and Tyrone Woods were not killed at a consulate office in Benghazi—as there is not such office there. They died at one of the largest CIA operations centers in the Middle East, which was located in Benghazi and served as the logistics headquarters for arms and weapons being shipped out of the post-Qaddafi Libya.

Although the U.S. government insisted that Stevens was involved in securing and destroying the numerous caches of arms and weapons once under the control of Qaddafi, the operation was more complex than that. The visual accounts of weapons being destroyed were indeed real, but those weapons were not operational. The working weapons were actually separated and transported to holding facilities for their eventual use in Syria. Russia was fully aware of this operation and warned the U.S. not to engage in the destabilization of Syria, as doing so would endanger their national security interests. Deposing Assad, as despotic as he might be, and replacing him with a Muslim Brotherhood-led regime would likely lead to unrestrained Islamic chaos across the region.

The Turkish warning

According to my source, Ambassador Stevens was in Benghazi on September 11, 2012 to meet with his Turkish counterpart, who reportedly warned Stevens that the operation was compromised. They met in person so that Stevens could be shown overhead satellite images, taken by the Russians, of nefarious activities taking place in Turkey. But just what were these nefarious activities?

It is reasonable to suspect that these activities were more dire than just your average “gun running” operation. Since the overthrow of Qaddafi, it is estimated that upwards of 40 million tons of weapons and arms were shipped out of Libya to Syria. But it was also known inside intelligence circles that Qaddafi possessed chemical weapons in addition to numerous surface-to-air missiles. Could it be that Russia obtained unmistakable surveillance footage of the anti-Assad “rebels” being shown how to load chemical payloads onto missiles inside Turkey near the border of Syria? Weapons, of course, that were shipped from Libya by the CIA in conjunction with various Muslim Brotherhood rebel groups. If so, such weapons could be used as a “false flag” type of operation—one that would be implemented to “set-up” Assad by making it appear that he was using these weapons on forces dedicated to his overthrow.

The blowback by the international community would be swift and punishing, and the entirety of the civilized world would be demanding his overthrow. NATO would then be used to expedite his ouster, and Russia’s moral position within the international community would be weakened. Was the meeting held to show Stevens that the operation was compromised and that they had to stop?

A Nation/State sponsored attack?

While the administration asserts that the attack in Benghazi was conducted by a group of rebels acting alone, the facts seem to indicate otherwise. The level of coordination was such that we did not deploy military assets, located just an hour or two away by air, to rescue Stevens and the others at the CIA operations center in their time of need. If, as the administration contends, that the attack was perpetuated by a group of frenzied rebels, our military could have easily handled them in short order. So why was there no rescue operation?

Perhaps the statements made yesterday by Leon Panetta [10/25/12], U.S. Secretary of Defense provides some insight if one analyzes the essence of those statements. Among other things, Panetta said that “...the basic principle is that you don’t deploy forces into harm’s way without knowing what’s going on…” Well, it has been confirmed we did know what was taking place on the ground in Benghazi, so exactly what did Panetta mean by this statement?

Against the backdrop of the official story, it makes little sense. If, however, one considers the alternative, that the attack was coordinated and was a nation/state sponsored attack, then it becomes clearer. Panetta and the highest levels of this administration likely knew exactly what we were doing, and knew that the operation was compromised. They knew, or had reason to believe, that the attack was being conducted at a nation/state level in response to our covert operation in Libya and arming the anti-Assad Syrian opposition.

Although Russia figures prominently here, Iran now comes into focus as Russia is not likely to directly engage U.S. forces. They must, however, protect their interests. Much like we were using anti-Assad forces to advance our objectives in Syria, Russia was using Iranian-backed forces to protect theirs. It appears that the attacks were conducted or facilitated by Iranian assets—perhaps as many as three teams of assets in Benghazi.

As the White House and other agencies monitored intelligence in real-time, they faced a dilemma. They knew that the nation/state sponsored attack teams were lying in wait for U.S. rescue forces to arrive, which is the reason the fight did not conclusively end sooner. They did not know exactly where all of the attack teams were, but knew they were present based on signal communication intercepts. Could they risk such exposure by deploying a rescue team to Benghazi, only to end up with another Black Hawk down type scenario? In addition to that scenario, the entire operation now becomes exposed for what it is. Take another look at Panetta’s statement in that context. Does it now make more sense? Bad PR in an election year, no?

As daylight approached with no response from the U.S. and no aid to the Americans under fire, the attack teams had to disperse into the cover of the remaining darkness, but not before their mission was accomplished. And sadly, it was.

Fallout

From the day of attack in Benghazi, Iran has been engaged in a full spectrum attack on the U.S. and NATO across the board involving embassies, bombing and even cyber attacks. All of this is the fallout from the arms and weapons smuggling operation, which was far greater than understood by the Western media.

Russia has now moved their contingent of S-400 missiles into much of Syria in anticipation of NATO establishing an “air cap” over Syria. A ten-mile “buffer zone” along Syria’s border has been created for Syrian refugees, but it also acts as a catalyst for the encroachment into Syrian territory. It sets the stage for further advancement and erosion of Syrian land, incrementally, of course.

It is also of critical importance to note that last weekend, Russia completed large-scale exercises of their Strategic Nuclear Forces under the watchful command of President Vladimir Putin. These were the first such nuclear exercises conducted since the fall of the Soviet Union.

To those with discernment, it is obvious that we are at the precipice of World War III. Putin himself stated as much, noting that WW III will not start in Iran but Syria, his own “red line in the sand.”

Douglas Hagmann

Visit the Northeast Intelligence Network Website by clicking HERE

Douglas J. Hagmann is the founder and director of the Northeast Intelligence Network and CEO of a multi-state licensed private investigative agency serving many Fortune 500 clients. A 23 year veteran of conducting investigations in the private sector, he has logged over 40,000 hours of covert surveillance in his career and is the author of Tactical Surveillance. He is a member of the International Counter- Terrorism Officers Association and possesses many law enforcement related training certifications. He has been used as an operational asset by federal law enforcement and various police departments, and has performed over 5,000 civil and criminal investigations throughout the United States. Following the attacks of September 11, 2001, Hagmann began using his investigative skills and training to fight terrorism and increase public awareness by establishing the Northeast Intelligence Network.

NOTE: To share or email this 'Specific' article, you must click on the Title of the article.

Sarah Palin - Obama Administration Benghazi Coverup

A series of internal State Department emails obtained by Fox News shows that officials reported within hours of last month's deadly consulate attack in Libya that militant group Ansar al-Sharia had claimed responsibility.

The emails provide some of the most detailed information yet about what officials knew in the initial hours after the attack. And it again raises questions about why U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Susan Rice, apparently based on intelligence assessments, would claim five days after the attack that it was a "spontaneous" reaction to protests over an anti-Islam film.

10/23/2012

Click HERE to see State Department Emails.

NOTE: To share or email this 'Specific' article, you must click on the Title of the article.

Bill Whittle - Bewitched!

Glamour! It's one of the qualities of a shape-shifter, a creature that appears as you want him to appear. Find out how the watchdogs became lapdogs, from The New York Times' Walter Duranty's cover-up of mass genocide to the giggling girlie-men Obama apologists today.

NOTE: To share or email this 'Specific' article, you must click on the Title of the article.

Erick Stakelbeck - Islam and the Battle For Our Minds

On this week's episode of the Stakelbeck on Terror show, author Michael Widlanski joins us to discuss his new book, Battle For Our Minds.

Widlanski says our government decision makers, the mainstream media and even our intelligence community are misleading the American people about the nature of the Islamic jihadist threat.

Widlanski descibes how they're doing it, why they're doing it and why it is so dangerous for America's national security.

Click HERE to View 'Obsession' Radical Islam.

Click HERE to View Major Active Islamic Terrorist groups.

Click HERE to View How Long has Islam attacked America.

NOTE: To share or email this 'Specific' article, you must click on the Title of the article.

Doug Giles - The Insane Stream Media Hates Gracious Christianity and Loves Violent Islam

Man, don’t cha love how the Insane Stream Media and their soft-brain disciples make Christians out to be fish-stickered, bug-eyed equals to incensed Islam? If you were to accept what the White House, some atheists and prattling gay activists say about Christians as true, you’d think the Church is chomping at the bit to chop off some heads of unbelievers, glory to Gawd!

Yep, if you were to believe the barf belched out by the BS brokers on the ludicrous Left, you’d stagger away stupid with the belief that there is little disparity between conservative Christians and militant Muslims.

As a matter of fact, you probably would be bamboozled into believing that Islam is a peaceful, Little House on the Prairie religion being temporarily hijacked by Jihadist renegades, and Christianity … Christianity is the real vicious, charity-vacant cult that’s vying for the opportunity to seize the whip and whip us good.

Yes, the Insane Stream Media’s reality stylists are working their butts off trying to convince us TV-addled cattle of two primary things: 1) Violent jihad is not based on the Koran, and 2) All conservative Christians are theocrats ready to burn Elton John at the stake, stone Snooki in a nearby gravel pit and governmentally ramrod Christianity down everyone’s pie hole.

I haven’t seen this kind of ham-fisted, farcical façade foisted upon the public since Michael Jackson tried to make out with Lisa Marie in an attempt to convince us all he’d found true love in an adult of the opposite sex.

Look, there’s no denying violent things have been done by the Church and in the name of God, but that has been the exception and not the rule. In addition, when the Church has spent time with its head up its butt doing bogus things, the Church’s leaders have historically owned it when wrong, have not repeated the gaffe, have grabbed the wheel and have effectively steered saints out of any erroneous, detrimental ditch.

Not so with Islam.

In Robert Spencer’s book, Religion of Peace? Why Christianity Is and Islam Isn’t, Bob shows those who can still be shown anything factual the massive and fundamental differences between Islam and Christianity. They are not equal no matter how much the blatherers of political correctness purport them to be. Their beliefs are not similar, nor their practices, nor their means of spreading their message—and to think otherwise could cost you your ass.

Spencer points out the crystal clear facts that clash with the current anti-Christian hype, such as …

1. Most Muslims do not condemn jihad.
2. Christianity and Islam have neither similar traditions nor similar modern realities.
3. Christian religious violence, real or imagined, does not mitigate the reality of jihad.
4. A “Christian theocracy” in America is a figment of the Left’s imagination.
5. The Islamic world has never developed the distinction between religious and secular law that is inherent in Christianity.
6. Christianity has embraced reason—and Islam has embraced … “Silence! I kill you!”
7. The Koran does not invite interpretation, and Muslim leaders refuse to discuss how to fit their beliefs into modern society.
8. Youtube flicks, Political differences and unwanted international interference are not, in fact, the cause of the turmoil in Iraq and Middle Eastern antagonism toward the west.
9. Jews, Christians and peoples of other faiths (or no faiths) are equally at risk from militant Islam—especially gays and women.
10. The most determined enemies of western civilization may not be the jihadists at all, but the leftists who fear their churchgoing neighbors more than Islamic terrorists.

Listen, 21st century truth reconstructors … you’ve gotta relax. Please do us all a favor and go get healed from your bad Sunday school experience and lay down your church-grinding axe. Thinking people aren’t buying the “Christianity = Islam” smack.

Get real, Goofy. You and I both know that regardless of what a few loopy CINOs (Christians in name only) have done via violence in the name of the Father, it’s not in the body of Christian doctrine to hack off the noggin of the obstreperous. There’s not even an obscure passage in the Book of Revelation that some demented clod could twist like your Gumby doll to make Christian Scripture green-light your demise or anyone else’s. Additionally, Christians aren’t longing for TBN to replace D.C. as our nation’s headquarters.

So chill, you shrill shredders of Christianity.

On the flip side, it is within the pages of the Koran to convert, conquer or kill non-Islamic people. And I’m a thinkin’ that no matter how much you work to besmirch Christianity and misinform the public on behalf of militant Islam, that if said Muslims had it their way, you would be a deceased grease stain on God’s green earth.

Therefore, gay guy, loosen that neckerchief and relax on the anti-Christian rhetoric, okay? Atheists, dial down and go back to studying monkeys (or whatever you do), and secularists, switch to decaf and exhale because you guys are barking up the wrong tree in trying to paint Christians as a coercive, could-be-violent cabal like militant Islam.

Doug Giles

Doug Giles’ new book “If You're Going Through Hell, Keep Going!" is now available. Ann Coulter says "Doug Giles is a substantive and funny tour de force for traditional values.” Doug’s talk show and video blog can be seen and heard at www.ClashRadio.com.

NOTE: To share or email this 'Specific' article, you must click on the Title of the article.

Michael from IL - Jack Wheeler - THE SELF-HATING DISHONESTY OF THE MEDIA

The most destructive, dishonest, and criminally hypocritical people in America today are not Democrat politicians, black race hustlers, Ivy League Marxist professors, or crony/shyster capitalists.

They are the publishers, editors, journalists, and commentators of the Liberal Media: Associated Press-New York Times-WaPo-ABC-NBC-CBS-CNN-MSNBC et al.

You could add the Moonbat Media like Daily Kos and HuffPo, but they're parasitic upon Big Lib Media, without whom no one would pay much attention to them.

We'll abbreviate Big Liberal Media to simply "BM" - appropriately enough for their product is the same as what those initials usually stand for. One of the more astounding things about BM is that its slavish boot-licking of American Commiecrats is indistinguishable from that of Pravda's or Izvestiya's over Soviet rulers during the Cold War - yet with no gun at their heads nor threat of the Gulag.

Winston Smith, in George Orwell's 1984, ended up genuinely loving Big Brother after his will was broken through torture. BM loves Big Brother of their own free will. This is so perverse it's almost anti-human, for it is normally against human nature to willingly be a slave.

A stunningly perfect example of BM perfidy appeared in headlines in newspapers all over the country this past weekend. It was the lead story on Drudge: US Should Return Stolen Land To Indian Tribes, Says United Nations. The Associated Press report's headline was: Mt. Rushmore Should Be Returned to Indigenous Native American Tribes, UN Official Says.

Every one of these stories - in hundreds of news outlets in papers local and national, and in countless websites and blogs - mentions the "official visit to the United States" by James Anaya, the "UN Special Rapporteur," who, after his "official visit," was quoted in a statement "issued by the U.N. human rights office in Geneva."

And in every one of these news stories, James Anaya's only - only - identification is that he is a "UN official," "the Special Rapporteur" (note the pretentious puffed-up Frenchie rapporteur title, instead of "reporter" in English). That's it. Nothing else. You'd think Anaya is a European international bureaucrat, Swiss maybe, as it's made to look like he has a big office in Geneva.

Folks, the guy is an Indian from Albuquerque. He lives in Tucson, where, as an Affirmative Action Baby, he lectures on "International Human Rights" at the University of Arizona Law School. Here's his faculty profile.

Somehow - I'm going out on a limb here - I don't think the headline, Mt. Rushmore Should Be Returned to Native Americans, Native American Teacher in Arizona Says, would generate quite the same media frenzy as one with the UN pretense. That's why every single story on Anaya, without exception, refuses to disclose who he really is. It took me approximately 30 seconds on Google to disclose it for myself.

The guy is a professional anti-American race grievance agitator. His expertise, on which he has written extensively, is the rights of "indigenous peoples" all over the world - yet his focus is exclusively on those in the US, plus Canada and Central America. Here is the full list of his academic publications.

He's an Indian from the Southwest, which once belonged to Mexico, that got it from Spain, that stole it from the "indigenous peoples" who first lived there and in what is now northern Mexico. Is there a single analysis or study of his regarding the rights of Indian tribes in Mexico? Not one.

Further afield, you'd think that anyone with a passion for indigenous rights world-wide would be interested in, say, the largest oppressed indigenous people on earth - the Kurds - or the most oppressed indigenous people on earth - the Tibetans. Nope, on them, Anaya is silent and indifferent.

He'd much rather demagogue Americans, using his "Special Rapporteur" con to demand Mt. Rushmore and the Black Hills be "returned" to the Sioux from whom we "stole" it. And of course, the BM is happy to help with the con.

You'll look in vain throughout the myriad of stories to learn that the Sioux Indians, who claim the Black Hills are "sacred" to them, stole the Black Hills in the early 1800s from the region's real indigenous people, the Arikara, who had lived there for many centuries.

Perhaps Anaya should argue that the Sioux thieves should turn over their claim to the Arikara - who are flourishing now, by the way, as they settled in North Dakota where underneath their land lies the Bakken oil formation. The Bakken Oil & Gas Expo is taking place today (5/09) on Arikara land.

So, why would the BM engage in the Fraud of Anaya? Why would they participate in a media scam to purposefully insult their country? Because the BM is composed of self-hating liberals. But that begs the question, why are they this way? Why can't those in the BM enjoy being American, rather than be embarrassed? Why do they want to hurt their own country?

This is a mystery to many conservatives, but not to TTPers who know the answer: because of the fear that all liberals have, the fear that makes them liberals, the fear that if they cast it aside would be liberals no more - the Fear of the Evil Eye of Envy.

This is most succinctly explained in Why Democrats Cannot Defend America (March 2008).

The key point is that: Liberalism, the mind-set that dominates today's Democrat Party and the BM, is not a political ideology or set of beliefs. It is a psychological strategy to avoid being envied. Liberalism is the politicalization of envy-appeasement.

This is why all Liberal/Democrat passions are frenzies of masochism. It is why the BM is bottomlessly masochistic, why it will sell out all its journalistic integrity, why it is impervious to moral decency and patriotism.

Thankfully, patriots still outnumber masochists in America, while the power of the latter is diminishing. How's this for a thrilling headline? Washington Post Faces Circulation and Revenue Collapse. Or this? CNN Ratings Decline Stirs Worries (at least at the New York Times).

Yet BM remain horrifically and criminally destructive. The rape/murder of 85 year-old Nancy Strait and murder of her 90 year-old husband Bob (who died on May 4) can be laid directly at the feet of NBC, who doctored the Zimmerman tape to maliciously portray him as a racist.

When the black racist monster, Tyrone Woodfork, is tried for his crimes, those at NBC responsible for the tape doctoring should be tried as accessories to murder. They cannot hide behind the First Amendment on this. Theirs was a willfully criminal act.

Yet putting members of the BM in jail will not stop their self-hating dishonesty. The only cure is laughter - our laughing and ignoring them. Our refusing to pander to them or take them seriously. Our exposing their lies and scams for all the world to see - like you can do now regarding the Arizona Race Hustler, James Anaya

Jack Wheeler

NOTE: To share or email this 'Specific' article, you must click on the Title of the article.

PJTV Trifecta - Sad Song for the Gray Lady: Trifecta Plays the World's Smallest Violin for The NY Times

Journalists at The New York Times are upset about their company pensions. One employee thinks that he might have to eat cat food in retirement, or even commit suicide. Is the Times a victim of its own arrogant liberal agenda? Find out.

April 2012

NOTE: To share or email this 'Specific' article, you must click on the Title of the article.

THP Videos - Dana Loesch on Media Matters, Planned Parenthood and Media Bias

In her 2012 Reed Irvine Accuracy in Media Award for Grassroots Journalism, BigJournalism Editor-in-Chief Dana Loesch takes on Planned Parenthood, George Soros, MSNBC and a "fascistic, witch-hunting, black-listing, book burning den of thieves" known as Media Matters for America.

---

NOTE: To share or email this 'Specific' article, you must click on the Title of the article.

---

Ann Coulter - Why Are the Media Obsessed With Bachmann?

"I think the top candidates, Rick Perry, Chris Christie, all of our candidates are ten times better than John Mccain...If it happens that Rick Perry fizzles, and I'm not saying he will, but often candidates look their best when they first announce and then sometimes they don't hold up so well. If Rick Perry fizzles, that's when Chris Christie jumps in.

---

NOTE: To share or email this 'Specific' article, you must click on the Title of the article.

---

Andrew Breitbart - The MSM's Absurd Accusations About Tea Party Activists

Alexis Garcia catches up with Andrew Breitbart at the Smart Girl Summit. Breitbart outlines how the media's narrative of the Tea Party is a weapon being wielded by Democrats, the White House, MSM pundits and even members of the GOP.

---

Related Post: Tea Party Extremists?
Related Post: The DC Debt Debacle & Cain's Energy Doctrine

---

NOTE: To share or email this 'Specific' article, you must click on the Title of the article.

---

Andrew Klavan - Michele Bachmann Makes a Gaffe

Michelle Bachmann is running for president and she's supported by the Tea Party. You know, the "angry" ... "emotional" ... "ugly" middle Americans with "low-sloping foreheads" who believe in constitutional government, lower spending and the rule of law. Let's join our MSM pals and freak out when Bachmann says something so we can let everyone know about it and she won't be elected in 2012. Is this fun or what?

---

NOTE: To share or email this 'Specific' article, you must click on the Title of the article.

---