The hospital-room questioning of the surviving suspect in the Boston Marathon bombings is generating concern about whether he should have been interrogated without first being told of his constitutional rights to silence and a lawyer – and, conversely, whether federal agents actually should have had more time with him before he was read his rights.
Dzhokhar Tsarnaev faced 16 hours of questioning before he was advised of his Miranda rights, and investigators say he told them of his role in the two bombings near the Boston Marathon finish line on April 15. He explained that he and his brother, Tamerlan, were angry about the U.S. wars in Afghanistan and Iraq and the killing of Muslims there, according to two U.S. officials who spoke on condition of anonymity because they weren't authorized to discuss the case with reporters.
He also described a spur-of-the-moment plan that the brothers hatched to drive to New York and set off their remaining explosives there, New York City officials said Thursday.
The "He did it First Argument" is supposed to be relegated to children who are bullies and have not been 'Parented Properly'.
When a spoiled little 'Narcissistic Child' is asked 'Why did you hit your little sister?' - the expected response is 'She hit me first'.
When a spoiled little 'Narcissistic Child' is confronted about 'Why did you take your little brothers toy?' - the expected response is 'He took my toy first'.
Liberal Progressives are 'Trapped in Limbo', with the mind of a 'Spoiled Narcissistic Child' and an adult body.
When these Liberal Progressive 'Spoiled Narcissistic Children' are asked 'Why is Barack Obama living such a lavish lifestyle and taking so many vacations using taxpayer money'? - the expected response is 'George Bush or someone else did it first'.
Exactly how does the 'Someone Else Did It First Argument' justify Barack Obama's actions or the actions of anyone else?
NOTE: Apologies to all 'Spoiled Narcissistic Children' because unlike Liberal Progressives they haven't had a chance to grow up yet.
RG (WJF)
The hospital-room questioning of the surviving suspect in the Boston Marathon bombings is generating concern about whether he should have been interrogated without first being told of his constitutional rights to silence and a lawyer – and, conversely, whether federal agents actually should have had more time with him before he was read his rights.
